![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
'Akers said the United States should make its legal-immigration process less cumbersome by setting up new Ellis Island-type facilities in places like El Paso and San Diego. The job of tracking immigrants, should be turned over to FedEx and UPS, he said: "They track 25 million packages a day. They'll do an infinitely better job of solving the problem."'
-- "GOP candidates Rossi, Didier, Akers face off in debate" (Paul Akers is running for the US Senate in Washington State, but he pretty much has no chance to win the Republican nomination, let alone the Senate seat.)
-- "GOP candidates Rossi, Didier, Akers face off in debate" (Paul Akers is running for the US Senate in Washington State, but he pretty much has no chance to win the Republican nomination, let alone the Senate seat.)
no subject
Date: 2010-08-05 10:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-05 10:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-05 11:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-05 11:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-06 02:30 am (UTC)-- Denys
no subject
Date: 2010-08-06 06:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-06 05:55 am (UTC)There isn't any such critter, any more. Remember we have a "top two" primary; two candidates of the same party can get those top two positions, so two Democrats and zero Republicans is a potential outcome. Or, one could vote for the weakest perceived candidate of the opposition party, to make life easier for the "major" candidate one prefers -- assuming you believe the major candidate can get enough votes to qualify for top two on their own.
So,as The Stranger says: "If Didier beats the other big-name Republican in this race—two-time gubernatorial loser Dino Rossi—then we'll never have to look at Rossi's smarmy, full-of-shit grin ever again and Democratic incumbent Patty Murray wouldn't have to break a sweat in the general."
OTOH, they then go and endorse Patty Murray anyway, because a) they're not that confident of Murray's margins in a race this tight (Rossi/Didier as a top two would suck), and b) voting for Didier is too unclean, even for them.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-06 06:17 am (UTC)The polling numbers looked like the really tough one might pass, and so people were urged to vote for the second as a "less worst case scenario". The first one didn't get enough votes to pass. The second one did. I suppose the first one might have passed if the second one wasn't also on the ballot, but it still hurts to have that second one around our necks. We really can't afford it.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-06 03:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-09 06:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-09 06:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-09 07:22 pm (UTC)