Dreading Kong
Dec. 15th, 2005 08:20 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
The first Peter Jackson film I saw was The Fellowship of the Rings, and I really liked it. It wasn't my favorite movie of the year (I liked both Moulin Rouge and Amelie better), but I saw it more times in the theater than any other movie just for the eye candy. I thought Jackson had done a wonderful job of capturing the look of Middle Earth. However, I pretty much hated the next two LOTR movies. They just seemed like big dumb (really dumb) loud war movies with lots of swoopy camera and silly slo-mo and painfully broad strokes and Elijah Wood looking constipated. I can't think of a worse scene in modern cinema than the one in The Return of the King where Denethor sends Faramir off to die in slo-mo while Denethor pulps cherry tomatos in his nasty teeth and Pippin sings a Celtic New Age song. WTF? Fortunately, there was Pirates of the Carribean and Johnny Depp in mascara to keep me entertained in the theater that year.
So you could say that I wasn't amongst those salivating when Jackson announced that he was remaking King Kong, but I figured that it might be fun to see a state of the art CGI Skull Island and inhabitants. If I kept my expectations low, I could probably enjoy it as a big dumb spectacle. But as I've read through a series of reviews of the movie, most of them more or less glowing and/or ecstatic, I find myself losing all interest. It sounds too much like the last two LOTR movies, except with even more monsters and noise and big, grand, sweeping, meaningful gestures, plus gorillas in the sunset. It seems as though watching it will be like drowning in big loud treacly pudding. It seems as though there is a huge machine trying to suck me into the theater to endure it so that I can Be With It. It fills me with Lovecraftian dread and loathing.
So now I'm not sure I'm even going to bother. I'd like to see a bigscreen winter spectacle, but none of the CGI fantasies -- Potter, Narnia, Kong -- are appealing to me. (I'll likely see Narnia anyway, if Denys is interested.) So I hope the spectacle of Heath Ledger and Jake Gyllenhaal having anal sex on the range ends up being entertaining, but I'm not sure I can cope with a tragic love story at the moment. So what else is there to look forward to?
So you could say that I wasn't amongst those salivating when Jackson announced that he was remaking King Kong, but I figured that it might be fun to see a state of the art CGI Skull Island and inhabitants. If I kept my expectations low, I could probably enjoy it as a big dumb spectacle. But as I've read through a series of reviews of the movie, most of them more or less glowing and/or ecstatic, I find myself losing all interest. It sounds too much like the last two LOTR movies, except with even more monsters and noise and big, grand, sweeping, meaningful gestures, plus gorillas in the sunset. It seems as though watching it will be like drowning in big loud treacly pudding. It seems as though there is a huge machine trying to suck me into the theater to endure it so that I can Be With It. It fills me with Lovecraftian dread and loathing.
So now I'm not sure I'm even going to bother. I'd like to see a bigscreen winter spectacle, but none of the CGI fantasies -- Potter, Narnia, Kong -- are appealing to me. (I'll likely see Narnia anyway, if Denys is interested.) So I hope the spectacle of Heath Ledger and Jake Gyllenhaal having anal sex on the range ends up being entertaining, but I'm not sure I can cope with a tragic love story at the moment. So what else is there to look forward to?
no subject
Date: 2005-12-17 03:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-17 07:02 pm (UTC)I'd ask what you thought of the Potter movie, but perhaps it would better for you to post any review-like thingy to your own LJ, so that all your Friends can benefit. Then again, they've all probably seen it already anyway.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-18 03:09 am (UTC)Can't see myself posting about the latest Potter since I don't have that much to say and none of it startlingly original. I enjoyed it, indeed I thought it better than the book, which was the first in the series to be bloated. The film left out a good deal of page filler (most of the sub-plot involving the newspaper reporter for example) and was the better for it. None-the-less there came a point where I began to hope the movie would end soon. I prefer movies to be no more than 90 minutes long so the present trend towards endlessness doesn't suit me at all. Due to not having seen the third movie and the second only once some years ago, it really struck me how much older the teenagers were and how much they had changed. I'd watched the first on tv not long before going to see this one so the difference especially fascinated me. Can't see how they can now make the fifth movie without straying into Beverly Hills 90210 territory. Also, is it just me or does Dumbledore have the makings of a serious addition? He was constantly putting wand to neck and extracting memories or something, which struck me as looking like heroin injection in reverse. Subversive imagery if you ask me.