![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
E.J. Dionne makes the argument that the presidential election has become a referendum on trickle-down economics, with Obama making the case for progressive taxation and McCain calling that socialism. One of Obama's rhetorical tricks that I just love is his description of trickle-down as the theory that if you give more money to the wealthy, some of it will trickle down on the rest of us. To my ear, the usage "trickle down on" conjures an image of the wealthy pissing on the rest of us. I'm guessing that's the image it's intended to conjure.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-01 05:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-01 05:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-01 05:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-01 05:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-01 06:25 pm (UTC)no matter how you grab.
The last bit of wealth will always
trickle down your leg.
(This needs a synonym for "clutch" that rhymes with "leg." It's also a reference to "no matter how you jiggle/no matter how you dance/the last little drop will always/trickle down your pants." Maybe you were referring to it as well.)
no subject
Date: 2008-11-01 06:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-01 09:22 pm (UTC)Courtesy of dear old dad.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-01 09:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-01 09:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-01 09:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-02 12:37 am (UTC)It's not intended to improve the well-being of the members of society in general -- the American people.
(I might be over-simplifying a bit by thinking of "socialism" as having this aim, but it's as close as I can get.)
And
Mr. Paulson has been careful not to buy Voting Stock in those financial institutions, so the Goverment will have no control whatsoever over how the money is spent, what pay or bonuses the Officers of them receive, or (from this end) the policies the companies follow.
After all, the people handling this probably expect that in a few more months they'll be officially employed, again, by these firms, and they won't want to have their style cramped by interference by such a large stockholder. Meanwhile, they seem to be concentrating on getting as much of our National Treasury as possible into the right private hands before January twentieth.
(Whether the situation is that of a "partnership between Government and Business" -- as per the original definition of "Fascism" -- might be another matter.)
no subject
Date: 2008-11-01 09:33 pm (UTC)which planet is McCain living on?
don't mind me, I'm just frothing at the mouth, nervous wreck, waiting for the whole thing to turn into an episode of 24 in its what third season...
no subject
Date: 2008-11-01 10:03 pm (UTC)Horses and sparrows
Date: 2008-11-02 09:09 am (UTC)Re: Horses and sparrows
Date: 2008-11-02 03:06 pm (UTC)