I didn't include the link at first, because it's only the headline that really interests me. Maybe I should take it back out, although I guess that would have only made your curiosity more difficult to satisfy.
Well, I clearly framed this badly, since everybody is reacting to the name. I thought it was funny that the news was that the birth was announced on Twitter, not the birth itself.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-05 04:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-05 04:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-05 05:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-05 05:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-05 10:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-05 10:48 pm (UTC)