It has just been announced that all budget cuts and layoffs at the University have been decided, "but there are technological problems within the Human Resources Office that are so severe they have not been able to move forward with the decisions." This whole situation makes me angry and sick to my stomach. It's bad enough that none of this is happening because the University is performing badly, and that we are ultimately paying for the idiocy of the financial geniuses who run this country. Now they have to prolong the uncertainty because of technological problems? It's maddening.
Page Summary
daveon.livejournal.com - (no subject)
don-fitch.livejournal.com - (no subject)
wrdnrd - (no subject)
smofbabe.livejournal.com - (no subject)
holyoutlaw.livejournal.com - (no subject)
kalimac.livejournal.com - (no subject)
surliminal.livejournal.com - (no subject)
farmgirl1146.livejournal.com - (no subject)
reverendjim.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2011-07-12 05:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-12 06:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-12 07:16 pm (UTC)(Hoping that that, from a third party, helps. There's usually _some_ consolation when aggrivation is shared.)
Sometimes I wonder about the motives of The People Who Run Things, when they develop "solutions" to what's basically a problem of excessive unemployment that include firing a lot of people. Perhaps especially when the people fired/laid-off are almost all at the lower-pay levels. But then, I don't expect that "Reduce salaries, starting with the President, Congress members, Governors, & State Legislators, by at least ten percent" would go over any better than "increase taxes on anyone with an income of over $100,000 per year by 3%, with no loopholes". *sigh*
Mind you, I've always admired Skinner's idea (in _Walden II_) that (Governmental & private) Executives' salaries be fixed in relation to the median income of the populace/workers. And yeah, it _is_ possible that I'm a Closet Socialist of some weird flavor.
no subject
Date: 2011-07-12 07:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-12 09:20 pm (UTC)We already know how it's affecting our office: a woman who is retiring next june is (a) not being replaced, and (b) has dropped down to 60% time for these next 12 months. You can imagine our office's collective reaction when the division VP announced that his division had somehow escaped unscathed and had taken "no cuts."
no subject
Date: 2011-07-12 09:45 pm (UTC)It's usually an old HR administration that's gone that didn't want to enter data into a new system and now it's a bunch of manual work to find out the sort of information the system could just spit out if lazy people had done their damned job.
Our HR department has a real problem definitively determining who has seniority under what conditions, and retreat rights complicate the situation, but the main problem is just under a decade ago our HR director didn't want to do more than she absolutely had to, and 2 years ago that started causing problems.
no subject
Date: 2011-07-12 10:03 pm (UTC)I also know that "technological problems" is not a 100% accurate description of current problems here WRT to layoffs, because i'm aware of people who have been definitively told already that they are getting laid off. When i say i smell bullshit i'm not denying that there are probably technological problems within HR -- i AM saying i don't think that's THE reason some people haven't been told they're being laid off.
no subject
Date: 2011-07-12 09:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-12 10:05 pm (UTC)As for the politics of uneven application of the cuts, best I bite my tongue.
Yeah, i've said all i'm going to say in a public venue. This sounds like a job for some sake! ;)
no subject
Date: 2011-07-12 10:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-13 06:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-13 06:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-13 06:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-12 09:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-12 10:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-12 10:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-12 10:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-12 11:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-13 01:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-13 06:34 pm (UTC)The reason i got into the habit of not discussing University stuff in public is that Andy was always worried that if i got to telling residence classification anecdotes while we were out to eat, he'd have to leap into action to protect me when someone whose residency i denied attacked me with restaurant cutlery. We DID avoid the U-Village liquor store for years and years because someone worked there who not only was denied residence classification -- he ALSO came into the office and got so red-faced and angry about it that David was pretty sure the guy was going to blow and start assaulting people. Tho' perhaps David just made that up to have a reason for standing around prominently displaying his "guns".
no subject
Date: 2011-07-13 06:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-13 07:02 pm (UTC)Frankly, what drove me from the job more than anything was routinely getting yelled at by parents. My favorites were the mom and dad who got on 2 extensions at their house and tag-teamed me.
no subject
Date: 2011-07-21 08:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-12 11:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-12 11:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-13 01:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-14 01:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-14 02:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-20 02:51 pm (UTC)I'd advise drinking fine beer.
no subject
Date: 2011-07-20 02:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-20 04:10 pm (UTC)Still, I'll be in the pub soon.