Manny Farber on Antonioni
Aug. 21st, 2008 10:29 amAmerican film critic and painter Manny Farber just died this week at age 91. I haven't read any of his film criticism yet (just ordered his collection, Negative Space), but I've read about his famous essay, "White Elephant Art Vs. Termite Art," in which he apparently had this to say about Antonioni (an exemplar, in his taxonomy, of white elephant art, which he despised):
Antonioni's specialty, the effect of moving as in a chess game, becomes an autocratic kind of direction that robs an actor of his motive powers and most of his spine. A documentarist at heart and one who often suggests both Paul Klee and a cool, deftly neat, “intellectual” Fred Zinnemann in his early Act Of Violence phase, he gets his odd, clarity-is-all effects from his taste for chic mannerist art that results in a screen that is glassy, has a side-sliding motion, the feeling of people plastered against stripes or divided by vertical and horizontals; his incapacity with interpersonal relationships turns crowds into stiff waves, lovers into lonely appendages hanging stiffly from each other, occasionally coming together like clanking sheets of metal but seldom giving the effect of being in communion.
As the blogger who posted this quote commented, Antonioni's theme was "the alienation resulting from modernity, and humans' incapacity for meaningful relationships," so you could say that Farber is affirming Antonioni's success at communicating his meaning. This characterization of Antonioni's theme is also a pretty good description of what I found off-putting about Blowup. Still, I have thoughts tugging at my backbrain about why I so enjoy Assayas' demonlover when it has similar things to say about modern alienation and the incapacity for meaningful relationships. Is it just that it's more conflicted about the seductive attractions of modernity?
Actually, it's probably because demonlover plays more like a genre thriller than an art movie.
Antonioni's specialty, the effect of moving as in a chess game, becomes an autocratic kind of direction that robs an actor of his motive powers and most of his spine. A documentarist at heart and one who often suggests both Paul Klee and a cool, deftly neat, “intellectual” Fred Zinnemann in his early Act Of Violence phase, he gets his odd, clarity-is-all effects from his taste for chic mannerist art that results in a screen that is glassy, has a side-sliding motion, the feeling of people plastered against stripes or divided by vertical and horizontals; his incapacity with interpersonal relationships turns crowds into stiff waves, lovers into lonely appendages hanging stiffly from each other, occasionally coming together like clanking sheets of metal but seldom giving the effect of being in communion.
As the blogger who posted this quote commented, Antonioni's theme was "the alienation resulting from modernity, and humans' incapacity for meaningful relationships," so you could say that Farber is affirming Antonioni's success at communicating his meaning. This characterization of Antonioni's theme is also a pretty good description of what I found off-putting about Blowup. Still, I have thoughts tugging at my backbrain about why I so enjoy Assayas' demonlover when it has similar things to say about modern alienation and the incapacity for meaningful relationships. Is it just that it's more conflicted about the seductive attractions of modernity?
Actually, it's probably because demonlover plays more like a genre thriller than an art movie.