randy_byers: (2010-08-15)
The past week has been quite a dose of culture. Last Tuesday Samuel R. Delany gave a reading at the downtown Seattle Public Library as part of this summer's Clarion West festivities. Delany is a terrific reader, and he was in fine form for this. He read from his latest novel, Through the Valley of the Nest of Spiders, and he also read from Phallos -- a novella that has recently been rereleased in an expanded version. (All of Chip's work is seemingly constantly under revision.) He introduced himself as our favorite dirty old man (the house was packed with enthusiastic folks), and both readings were blatantly sexual, although part of the joke in Phallos is that it's about a pornographic novel of uncertain provenance in which the sex has been censored to make it safe for the internet.

In many ways the Q&A session after the reading was even more entertaining. Somebody asked a question about "Aye, and Gomorrah," which won a Nebula Award in 1967. I can't even remember what the question was, but Delany called the politics of the story "trogdolytic" in its portrayal of queerness as something tragic and lugubrious, in short nothing like the life he was actually living in those pre-Stonewall days. He launched into a wonderful story about how he'd made his first trip to Paris in 1966 with two straight friends and had immediately run into a man masturbating in the Tuileries Garden and went home with him. This man was a medical student from Senegal, and the next day he and his friends (all of them gay Africans) invited Chip and his friends over for dinner. Well, it was all very much like a scene out of one of Chip's later stories, and it was completely delightful.

I confess that Chip's sex-drenched and socially-expansive stories left me feeling very wistful that evening. I've been in a mild funk since Westercon due to a new confrontation with my own sexual and social disabilities. Nothing very profound, just some ancient frustrations and confusions that I've long lived with. My life as an anxious introvert, I guess. I envy Chip the carefree attitude he projects in public.

Anyway, on Friday I went to SIFF Cinema Uptown to see the silent version of Hitchcock's 1929 film, Blackmail. (It was simultaneously filmed as his first sound film.) This was part of a traveling show called the Hitchcock 9, which features the nine surviving silent films by Hitchcock, all of which have been restored by the British Film Institute. Blackmail looked absolutely amazing. Hitchcock was already an accomplished visual stylist by this point (the influence of Murnau and Lang is plain to see), and this print (or digital file) was taken directly from the negatives, looking very sharp and pristine. The story was prime Hitchcock material: a Scotland Yard detective's girlfriend (played by Anny Ondra, who reminded me of Fay Wray in her mannerisms) goes out on a date with another man behind her boyfriend's back. The man tries to rape her, and she kills him. Another man knows she did it and tries to blackmail her. The layers of guilt are properly convoluted, but the story sags a bit in the middle when Hitchcock doesn't seem to know what to do with the characters except have them brood and leer at each other. Still, it was gorgeous to look at, and if it comes out on DVD I'll pick it up. I also enjoyed the minimalist, almost ambient accompaniment by the Diminished Men at this showing.

My plan coming into the weekend had been to catch another of the Hitchcock 9 on both Saturday and Sunday, but then another option presented itself to me. My neighbor's boss offered her a pass to the dress rehearsals for the Wagner Ring Cycle that the Seattle Opera is about to put on. My neighbor couldn't use it, so she offered it to me. I've always wanted to see the Ring, but never strongly enough to actually, you know, go. Here it was, handed to me on a platter. After examining the schedule, however, I wasn't sure I really wanted to devote that much time to it. The first opera in the cycle, Das Rheingold, is two and half hours long, but the other three are all over four hours apiece.

Well, I decided I'd go to Das Rheingold on Saturday at the very least, and so I did. I also went to Die Walküre on Sunday, and am now leaning heavily toward seeing the other two as well. Suffice it to say that I'm enjoying it so far, although not without some reservations. But there's something very thrilling and epic about it that cannot be denied. As a production, it is absolutely spectacular, with amazing sets and special effects and costumes. It also feels like a blast of our culture. It connects to so many different things, from the modern heroic fantasy genre to Star Wars to the music of Mahler and Schoenberg that I've been listening to in large doses lately. Listening to the music I can hear the echoes in so many things I've heard before. Last night at Die Walküre I was hearing the music from the 1939 Wizard of Oz, for example.

I liked Die Walküre better than Das Rheingold, although there was plenty of music in Das Rheingold that I really, really liked. There was singing in both of them that I didn't care for very much. (I think I like the singing in Italianate operas better than Germanic ones in general.) As much as I liked Die Walküre, I didn't care for the third act very much. My biggest problem with these operas so far is probably that there's too much declaiming of exposition, as the characters explain things to each other at great length. This leads to some strange staging as secondary characters move around aimlessly and strike poses just to try to make it seem like something is happening when nothing is really happening except exposition.

But then a magical moment will arise: Brünnhilde appearing to Siegmund in the moonlight, or Loge and Wotan tricking Alberich into turning into a frog in the dark gold mines. I can't begin to describe how splendid the sets and the production are. They've created the most beautiful forest sets! In the opening scene in Das Rheingold the Rhine maidens are "swimming" in the air -- essentially wirework in realtime, swooping up and down and floating across the stage and doing somersaults in midair. Simply amazing.

I could go on and on about things I've liked (much of the music, although not all) and haven't liked (some of the more emphatic, thumping music, for example), but I also want to talk about how much fun it has been going to the opera house. I wore my suit on Saturday, only to reacquaint myself with the fact that the slacks need to be taken in. So on Sunday I wore a shirt and tie with jeans. I've been admiring the women in their finery. It's like going to a costume ball. Because the tickets are first come first serve, you're advised to show up an hour and a half early. That has given me time to sit in the bistro and drink wine and people watch and read a book (Banks' Surface Tension, which coincidentally opens on an opera stage). The crowd is very enthusiastic. There's a lot of excitement in the air. People wonder aloud if Tolkien based Lord of the Rings on the Ring Cycle. (I refrained from telling them that Tolkien was influenced by the original mythology and actually detested Wagner.) And I hadn't been to McCaw Hall since it was remodeled, and it is quite a beautiful building itself. It's all a great deal of fun just as an event.

Meanwhile, on top of this epic flood of culture I'm also painting the backside of the house. I have been a very, very busy boy, I tell you. The weather has been brilliant, and I'm sure I've been flooded with Vitamin D as well as with culture. The physical activity has left me feeling energetic. To hell with mild funks and old frustrations. I'm having a ball!
randy_byers: (Default)
So I was a busy boy yesterday. Took care of correspondence, updated various databases, and mailed a few copies of the Corflu progress report in the morning. Amazing how much time just dealing with correspondence can take, but the feedback on the PR has been great. Then I spent two hours weeding the traffic circle in the afternoon. Feeling a righteous soreness and fatigue after that, I snuggled into my cinematic coccoon and watched a couple of films from 1958.

Third time was sort of a charm for Hitchcock's Vertigo. I first saw it in the theater in 1984 when the Jimmy Stewart Hitchcocks were re-released after a period in legal limbo. I joined the crowd at the Neptune in laughing at it. I saw it again on TV a few years after that, and I still found it pretty silly. I couldn't buy Jimmy Stewart, for chrissake, as a sweaty pervert, and the ending just seemed laughable again. But last night I finally began to warm to it. Hitchcock's movies are always a little cold to me anyway, and I still can't say that Vertigo engages me in any personal way. It's fascinating as a construct, an artifice, an almost mechanical dream. Perhaps I understand the doppelgänger better than I used to, and this is definitely a doppelgänger film. However, for all its personal touches, it's still very much a Hollywood construct, and the ending in particular feels like a contrived Production Code payback for the sins of the woman. One of the things I hadn't really clued into before was her culpability in the crime that -- tellingly -- drives the movie but is never seen directly. Another problem I've probably had with the movie is how unpleasant Stewart's character is, and how unpleasant the attitude toward women is. At least in Rear Window and To Catch a Thief (my two favorite Hitchcocks), Grace Kelly is allowed some spunk. The woman with the amorphous identity in Vertigo is a puppet through and through. However, I've always loved Bernard Hermann's score, and I finally realized last night how much it owes to Debussy, which opened the movie up for me: it is oceanic, transformative, a vision of the abyss. For me, the Hollywood surface interferes with my appreciation of the depths, but perhaps now I can see past the surface better. The ending begins to make more sense as the expression of something primitive and fearful, something irrational, absurd, unsettling. It's another dream of sex and death and fate.

After that I dug into the new set from Universal of Orson Welles' Touch of Evil. In contrast to Vertigo, Touch of Evil has been one of my very favorite movies from the first time I saw it on TV. The new DVD includes three versions of the movie: the original theatrical release, a longer preview version that was discovered in the '70s, and the even longer "restored" version that Walter Murch put together based on Welles' famous 58 page memo, written in reaction to the cuts the studio made after they took the film away from Welles in post-production. That's the only version I've seen in the theater, on my birthday in 1998. Last night I watched the theatrical release, which I don't think I'd seen before. The only noticeable difference to my eyes was that it cut the sequence where Janet Leigh is driven out to the motel, absurdly pursued by Uncle Joe Grandi.

This is a sleazy, lurid movie -- a cheap, '50s paperback exploitation novel of a movie. But the script is rock solid and tightly structured, even as important details are thrown off in the margins or in overlapping dialog. It takes several viewings to piece it all together. Hell, this viewing was the first time I realized that the girl whose Mexican boyfriend is accused of the murder is the murder victim's daughter. Duh, I know, but ... The thing that has always appealed to me the most about Touch of Evil is the arresting, engrossing visual brio of it all. The camera is almost always moving, the image always off-kilter and askew, Russell Metty's camera always finding new angles to surprise and tease us with. The eye is always distracted. Another thing I noticed last night was how many shots feature crumpled newspaper sheets blowing through the frame like so much tumbleweed, which is both visually lovely and a sign of how trashy the town is. How tawdry everything looks, how exciting. The stench of corruption, sweet as maryjane. Mancini's raucous, rocking, bump-and-grind score. "I'm always thinking of her, drunk or sober. What else is there to think about, except my job, my dirty job?"

Profile

randy_byers: (Default)
randy_byers

September 2017

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10 111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 24th, 2025 06:03 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios