randy_byers: (powers expdt)
Yesterday [livejournal.com profile] ron_drummond and I were talking about Joanna Russ, and he told me the story of how he first heard of her and of the series of important connections that followed from that. It's a great story, and I hope he writes it up. It involves Chip "Samuel R." Delany, and it got me thinking about the likelihood that Chip was also the one who, less directly, introduced me to Russ' work.

There's no way to know for sure, but I pulled out my log of all the books I've read since March 29, 1979 just to see what it would tell me. I was still 18 at the time I started the log, and I had been a big science fiction reader for several years already. Memory tells me that I'd read Delany's Babel-17 in the fall of 1978 and hadn't been impressed. (I'd bounced off Dhalgren in the eighth grade in 1974, the year it was published.) Then I went to my first science fiction convention, where I met Denys, and Denys urged me very strongly to try Delany again. And because I was so bowled over by Denys, I did try Delany again. My log book probably does reflect this. Delany's The Einstein Intersection is #9 on the list, which means I read it sometime relatively soon after March 29, 1979, which would be about right for a post-Norwescon timeframe. The record shows, to no one's surprise, that I worked my way steadily through Delany's oeuvre thereafter.

One curious thing I learned from looking at the log is that the first book I read by Thomas Disch was On Wings of Song, which I read shortly before the next date I recorded, which was July 7, 1979. (I had read fifty books in that four month period. It probably takes me two or three years to read fifty books these days.) Delany, Disch, and Russ were my trinity of great writers in those early years at college. My theory going into this historical exercise was that Chip's critical writing about Disch and Russ is what turned me on to them, but my log book doesn't necessarily support that theory when it comes to Disch. My thought, which Ron had also suggested, was that it was Delany's collection of essays, The Jewel-Hinged Jaw that introduced me to Disch and Russ, but I apparently didn't read that until December 1979. By then I had already read 334, The Genocides, The Puppies of Terra, Echo Round His Bones, and Fun with Your New Head.

However, the log does seem to support the theory that The Jewel-Hinged Jaw is what brought my attention to Joanna Russ. Four entries later comes Alyx (the Gregg Press edition), and later in January 1980 I also read And Chaos Died for the first time. I read The Female Man, We Who Are About To, and The Two of Them in March. The log confirms my memory that And Chaos Died was my favorite: I reread it in February 1981 and then again in December 1981. Turns out I misremembered something else, however: I did reread We Who Are About To, in 1982, and I reread all her other novels over that period too. I haven't gone through all thirty years of my log, but from what I did look at it appears that the only other novel of hers I read a third time is The Two of Them, and it's probably true that I've always liked that one slightly better than the more famous The Female Man too. I read And Chaos Died a fourth time in 1989, and I haven't looked any further than that. In 1989 I would've still been hoping that I could write something like my favorite Joanna Russ novel.

In my personal pantheon John Crowley joined the original trinity slightly later in time. (Eventually Disch fell out.) I discovered him on my own, as far as I can tell. The log confirms that I read The Deep first, in 1980. I have a very clear memory of reading the paperback in the dilapidated easy chair that carl and I had in our apartment in Eugene. What I didn't remember is when and in what order I read the rest of his existing work. The record shows that I read Beasts sometime between March and August 1981 and that I read Engine Summer in August. That one I remember reading in the upstairs bedroom of my parents' house in Portland, where I was staying for the summer. I read Little, Big in February 1983, and that's when Crowley joined my pantheon.

Well, I don't know why I felt compelled to share all this. I guess Joanna's death triggered the memories. Someone recently pointed me to a long blog post an artist did on how to train yourself creatively, and one of the guy's suggestions was to read everything by your favorite writer and then read all of your favorite writer's favorite writers. That's what I was doing back then. If I saw a book with a blurb from Delany, I read it. I pored over his essays about Joanna Russ, and carl and I pooled our money (a buck-25 each) to buy Sharee a copy of Fundamental Disch, which Chip edited. It was exciting times, and my brain was exploding with new input. I dreamed that someday I'd join my pantheon as one of the greatest science fiction writers of the era. Well, a boy could dream in those days. It was a good dream to chase after, even if what ended up catching me was something entirely different.
randy_byers: (Default)
There's a huge thread at Making Light about the uses and abuses of fanfic. It made me think again about an idea I kicked around back when I read the rec.arts.sf.written newsgroup. What struck me at the time was the sheer number of humungous threads that took a book or story and started speculating about the implications of the world-building, whether it was the artificial wombs of Bujold's Barrayar books or the personality-conditioning tapes in Cherryh's Cyteen or the military service requirement of Heinlein's Starship Troopers. As an English major, I had been taught that the job of literary criticism was explication of the text, but here were readers who left the text behind and tried to work out how the ideas expressed in the text could be elaborated further or in different directions and what other social implications they had that the author hadn't addressed. I came to think of this as speculative reading.

The discussion of fanfic makes me think that it does something similar, in that it's a form in which readers follow their own ideas about an established literary universe. It's another way of working out implications and further developments of a story or text. And this has got me thinking about Ioan Couliano's theory in The Tree of Gnosis that human religious beliefs can be seen as a systematic working out of binary variations on other beliefs, so that if one group believes that god is a benevolent figure, another group will believe that god is a malevolent figure, and if one group believes that god is a benevolent male, another will believe that god is a benevolent female, and another will believe god is a malevolent male and another that god is a malevolent female and so on, with the orthodoxies trying to stamp out the numberless "heretical" variations. Does fanfic work this way as well, with different readers finding aspects of the story to reverse and then explore along that axis? Certainly the smuttier fanfic seems to work through every sexual coupling possible in a given group of characters.

One thing all of this gets at is that we experience Story as malleable. A story is never finished or final, and so we seek the directors cut, the outtakes, the variant edits in movies as well. Criterion just released a DVD set with three variant cuts of Orson Welles' Mr Arkadin, one of which was made recently by fans scholars trying to recreate Welles' original intent. Text itself is variable, and so we have the variant versions of Shakespeare's plays and scholarly arguments about the best or original or most complete version. These are all different forms of speculative reading. Story is protean, changing from one form to another in our hands as we chase after a fleeting glimpse of what really happened, what's really there, what the meaning is, heading asymptotically toward the horizon of the possible and the dream of getting it on with the dream.

Profile

randy_byers: (Default)
randy_byers

September 2017

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10 111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 10th, 2025 10:31 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios