The Man I Love (1947)
Dec. 13th, 2009 10:56 amThe milieus of the film, the dingy apartment Petey shares with her family and the beach bar where she meets San contrasting with the flashy nightclub and its patrons, represent the dual impulses of the main character. For Lupino as Petey is the true protagonist of the film and what disturbs her, more than the antipathy between these two environments through which she moves or her tenuous relationship with the impenetrable San, is the sense of imprecise but tangible malaise which those around her both experience and engender. ... The songs which she sings in The Man I Love capture her emotional vacillation from the idealism of the title song and "My Bill" to the hopelessness of "Why Was I Born?"
-- Film Noir, An Encylopedic Reference to the American Style, 3rd Ed.
Wow. This is a very unusual picture. Is that why it's so obscure? Directed by Raoul Walsh, who got his start in the early days of Hollywood (circa 1913) and kept working into the '60s. By 1947 (or 1945, when The Man I Love was actually filmed) he was such a master of Hollywood genre film-making that he could move effortlessly between genres within a single film, as he does here. Crime film, musical, noir, romantic melodrama -- it should be a confusing mishmash, but instead feels incredibly sophisticated. Part of that is down to Ida Lupino in the lead role. She is just magnificent as the sexy, smart, tough, and tender torchsinger, Petey, on the rebound from a failed relationship, playing temporary matriarch for her troubled sisters and brother, making her way through a dark and disillusioned post-war America, fixing the problems she can but still running aground on hidden shoals of the heart.
Even as as a musical, this is quite different from other Hollywood musicals of the era. The songs, by George Gershwin, comment on the feelings of the characters, but it's all within the context of performing musicians. The film captures the feeling of late night jazz jams like nothing else I've seen. You feel like you're hanging out in a bar with a band that's really feeling it. All shot in film noir style, with sharp shadows and lazy lattices of cigarette smoke.
Walsh once again (as in his great Western noir, Pursued) gives a ninety-minute movie a novelistic density. There doesn't seem to be a wasted move, and the storyline is always evolving, even if its less about plot than about character, feeling, and atmosphere. Early on the slimy nightclub owner, Nick, makes a move on Petey's married sister, Sally, who blows him off. He threatens her, reminding her that her brother works for him. A few scenes later, the worthless wannabe-gangster brother brings her a Christmas present, a beautiful gown. It turns out to be a gift from Nick, and she rejects it. Next scene, Petey shows up at Nick's nightclub dressed in the gown. She's going to get him off her sister's back. She auditions for him with a song. He's glued to her thereafter, but she's quite capable of fending him off, still looking for a man she can love, somebody worthy of her.
There are a lot of subtle visual touches. At the beach club, the owner comes up to say hi to Nick and to be introduced to Petey, whose reputation as a singer has spread around town. She pointedly does not offer her hand to him. He puts his own hand on her shoulder, and she gives it a little look of contempt. She doesn't make a scene, but she lets everyone know where they stand with her.
I suppose this is the kind of movie that will never be widely popular. The cast is too obscure (no Bogart, no Bette Davis), the director is too obscure, the genre too mixed, too contradictory, not quite fatal enough for true film noir, yet too downbeat for a musical. Perhaps it's a film for aficionados. Martin Scorsese loves it, and it's one of the "musical noirs" (along with My Dream Is Yours) that he styled his New York, New York after. It really is something. And I haven't even mentioned the bitch-slapping that Lupino gives one of the men who loses his cool over a no-good woman!
By the way, I got this as a download from the Warners Archive. It's ten dollars cheaper than buying one of the archive movies as a DVD-R (once you take shipping into account), yet there are definite disadvantages. It has DRM that supposedly keeps it from being played on any other device than my computer. There are no chapter stops, so you pretty much have to watch the whole movie at one sitting or start over from the beginning. I can't watch it with my normal movie software, so I can't take screen caps. Still, the ten dollars cheaper is significant. I may get more movies this way, perhaps more Raoul Walsh. (I've previously ordered two Jacques Tourneur movies as DVD-Rs.)
-- Film Noir, An Encylopedic Reference to the American Style, 3rd Ed.
Wow. This is a very unusual picture. Is that why it's so obscure? Directed by Raoul Walsh, who got his start in the early days of Hollywood (circa 1913) and kept working into the '60s. By 1947 (or 1945, when The Man I Love was actually filmed) he was such a master of Hollywood genre film-making that he could move effortlessly between genres within a single film, as he does here. Crime film, musical, noir, romantic melodrama -- it should be a confusing mishmash, but instead feels incredibly sophisticated. Part of that is down to Ida Lupino in the lead role. She is just magnificent as the sexy, smart, tough, and tender torchsinger, Petey, on the rebound from a failed relationship, playing temporary matriarch for her troubled sisters and brother, making her way through a dark and disillusioned post-war America, fixing the problems she can but still running aground on hidden shoals of the heart.
Even as as a musical, this is quite different from other Hollywood musicals of the era. The songs, by George Gershwin, comment on the feelings of the characters, but it's all within the context of performing musicians. The film captures the feeling of late night jazz jams like nothing else I've seen. You feel like you're hanging out in a bar with a band that's really feeling it. All shot in film noir style, with sharp shadows and lazy lattices of cigarette smoke.
Walsh once again (as in his great Western noir, Pursued) gives a ninety-minute movie a novelistic density. There doesn't seem to be a wasted move, and the storyline is always evolving, even if its less about plot than about character, feeling, and atmosphere. Early on the slimy nightclub owner, Nick, makes a move on Petey's married sister, Sally, who blows him off. He threatens her, reminding her that her brother works for him. A few scenes later, the worthless wannabe-gangster brother brings her a Christmas present, a beautiful gown. It turns out to be a gift from Nick, and she rejects it. Next scene, Petey shows up at Nick's nightclub dressed in the gown. She's going to get him off her sister's back. She auditions for him with a song. He's glued to her thereafter, but she's quite capable of fending him off, still looking for a man she can love, somebody worthy of her.
There are a lot of subtle visual touches. At the beach club, the owner comes up to say hi to Nick and to be introduced to Petey, whose reputation as a singer has spread around town. She pointedly does not offer her hand to him. He puts his own hand on her shoulder, and she gives it a little look of contempt. She doesn't make a scene, but she lets everyone know where they stand with her.
I suppose this is the kind of movie that will never be widely popular. The cast is too obscure (no Bogart, no Bette Davis), the director is too obscure, the genre too mixed, too contradictory, not quite fatal enough for true film noir, yet too downbeat for a musical. Perhaps it's a film for aficionados. Martin Scorsese loves it, and it's one of the "musical noirs" (along with My Dream Is Yours) that he styled his New York, New York after. It really is something. And I haven't even mentioned the bitch-slapping that Lupino gives one of the men who loses his cool over a no-good woman!
By the way, I got this as a download from the Warners Archive. It's ten dollars cheaper than buying one of the archive movies as a DVD-R (once you take shipping into account), yet there are definite disadvantages. It has DRM that supposedly keeps it from being played on any other device than my computer. There are no chapter stops, so you pretty much have to watch the whole movie at one sitting or start over from the beginning. I can't watch it with my normal movie software, so I can't take screen caps. Still, the ten dollars cheaper is significant. I may get more movies this way, perhaps more Raoul Walsh. (I've previously ordered two Jacques Tourneur movies as DVD-Rs.)
Krilkick the frenestrand, grindle
Oct. 18th, 2009 10:00 amRadio Announcer #1: Yes, friends, if you want krilkick that will frenestrand, if you want cocolick with neodolimer, then try Hic Shampoo, for hair that will grindle!
Radio Announcer #2: For hair that will glanville and monde, and give beautiful phyllostrand, get the large economy size!
Radio Announcer #3: Yes, only Humperdinick's Magnetic Shaving Cream contains atom-francid mottletry -- the mottletry that makes any property...
-- My Dream Is Yours (1949)
I don't know what's weirder, this bit of throwaway nonsense in the middle of a Hollywood movie of the studio era, or the fact that I'm watching things like early Doris Day musicals. What the hell? I guess I could claim that I'm watching Michael Curtiz movies, but still.
Well, here's how it happened. I was reading Self-Styled Siren's post about The Man I Love, and somebody pointed to this entry in Martin Scorsese's list of Guilty Pleasures:
My Dream Is Yours (1949, Michael Curtiz) and The Man I Love (1946, Raoul Walsh). Both are musical films noirs about nightclub singers; they had a lot to do with New York, New York. When we asked Doris Day about My Dream Is Yours, she said, "That's my life story." The style, the color, the decor, I took it all for New York, New York. For the opening titles I wanted a New York skyline -- the one from The Man I Love. We wound up painting the film.
It was the mention of film noir that did it, of course, although I'm hard pressed to think of what was noir about this movie. Maybe the hints of the sleazy underbelly of Hollywood, where Doris Day becomes the next best thing to a stripper in order to pay rent. Still, this is Doris Day we're talking about. Doris Day and sleaze make about as much sense as a word combination as glanville and monde.
Radio Announcer #2: For hair that will glanville and monde, and give beautiful phyllostrand, get the large economy size!
Radio Announcer #3: Yes, only Humperdinick's Magnetic Shaving Cream contains atom-francid mottletry -- the mottletry that makes any property...
-- My Dream Is Yours (1949)
I don't know what's weirder, this bit of throwaway nonsense in the middle of a Hollywood movie of the studio era, or the fact that I'm watching things like early Doris Day musicals. What the hell? I guess I could claim that I'm watching Michael Curtiz movies, but still.
Well, here's how it happened. I was reading Self-Styled Siren's post about The Man I Love, and somebody pointed to this entry in Martin Scorsese's list of Guilty Pleasures:
My Dream Is Yours (1949, Michael Curtiz) and The Man I Love (1946, Raoul Walsh). Both are musical films noirs about nightclub singers; they had a lot to do with New York, New York. When we asked Doris Day about My Dream Is Yours, she said, "That's my life story." The style, the color, the decor, I took it all for New York, New York. For the opening titles I wanted a New York skyline -- the one from The Man I Love. We wound up painting the film.
It was the mention of film noir that did it, of course, although I'm hard pressed to think of what was noir about this movie. Maybe the hints of the sleazy underbelly of Hollywood, where Doris Day becomes the next best thing to a stripper in order to pay rent. Still, this is Doris Day we're talking about. Doris Day and sleaze make about as much sense as a word combination as glanville and monde.
Post-Hallowe'en sniffling
Nov. 2nd, 2008 08:14 amWell, I've got the sniffles, and they seem to have started hitting me Hallowe'en night. I didn't have the energy to watch any of the movies I wanted to, and I went to bed early. Appropriately enough, just after midnight I got a call from Sharee, who was a bit drunk. It'd been a couple months since we last talked, and she confirmed that she plans to go to the Montreal Worldcon. Asked me to get her a membership, in fact. Yay! How many sleeps until Montreal? Another nice thing was that when I filled out the membership form yesterday, I discovered that because of the surging US dollar, her membership was 25 USD less than the one I bought for myself just less than a month ago.
Anyway, yesterday I watched one of the movies I had intended to watch on Hallowe'en, Phantom of the Paradise (1974). This was one of my favorite movies when I was in college, and I still think it's great. A mix of Faust, Phantom of the Opera, and The Picture of Dorian Gray, with a heavy dose of Alice Cooper and KISS thrown in. The last time I watched it on DVD, which was the first time I'd seen it in years, I felt the music didn't hold up well, but last night I decided it mostly works just fine. It actually covers a number of different musical styles, from Philly doo-wop to California beach grooves to campy heavy metal thunder. It's the '70s-style ballads that seem bland to me now, but there's really only a couple of those. The visual style is pretty eclectic, too, with lots of fish-eye distortions and a reference to German expressionism that I hadn't picked out before. Paul Williams is perfect as the mephistophelian Swan, purveyor of Death Records, with its beautiful dead crow logo that crops up everywhere in the design of the movie. The satire on the hit machine music industry is sharp, oh, and Gerrit Graham as the gay (or at least effeminate) heavy metal singer, Beef, is still probably my favorite character in the whole thing. "I know drug real from real real." It struck me last night that this would make a good double feature with The Rocky Horror Picture Show (1975), which has a similar glam musical and genre mash-up sensibility. Speaking of favorite movies in my college days.
Before that I watched Abel Ferrara's adaptation of William Gibson's New Rose Hotel (1998). I had heard such horrible things about this movie when it came out (direct-to-video, as I recall) that I was never interested in giving it a try, but recently on Dave Kehr's blog Brad Stevens made the case for Ferrara and specifically for New Rose Hotel as one of his masterpieces. I don't know if it's a masterpiece, but it was more interesting than I had expected from other reactions I've seen. It doesn't capture the high tech surface of Gibson's story and in fact barely feels like science fiction at all, but it does get the globalism and corporate conspiracy and Japanophilia. This is the story of a couple of conmen who are hired to convince a Japanese scientific genius to defect from the German coporation he works for. Their plan is to hire a hooker to lure him with the promise of love. So it's a very tawdry film in many ways, with more than a hint of exploitation films about it. (E.g., half-naked writhing girls.) It reminded me of Olivier Assayas' demonlover (2002) in that way, and also in the focus on corporate espionage. There were some similarities to Assayas' Boarding Gate (2007) as well, partly because Asia Argento is in both and because of the talkiness. Christopher Walken is great as Fox, the philosophical song and dance con man with the broken back, and Willem Dafoe is pretty good as the henchman who falls in love with Argento's hooker mole. One of the controversial things about the movie is that much of the story is repeated in the second half. The question is whether the repetition actually changes our understanding of what happens, or whether it just hammers the point home ham-handedly. Not sure what I think on that question myself. I will say that I think demonlover is a much, much better movie on pretty much every level. Still, I'll watch it again at some point, because the structure is something that probably requires a second viewing to fully unwind.
Still sniffling today and feeling run down. Maybe I'll watch more movies and dream of Montreal.
Anyway, yesterday I watched one of the movies I had intended to watch on Hallowe'en, Phantom of the Paradise (1974). This was one of my favorite movies when I was in college, and I still think it's great. A mix of Faust, Phantom of the Opera, and The Picture of Dorian Gray, with a heavy dose of Alice Cooper and KISS thrown in. The last time I watched it on DVD, which was the first time I'd seen it in years, I felt the music didn't hold up well, but last night I decided it mostly works just fine. It actually covers a number of different musical styles, from Philly doo-wop to California beach grooves to campy heavy metal thunder. It's the '70s-style ballads that seem bland to me now, but there's really only a couple of those. The visual style is pretty eclectic, too, with lots of fish-eye distortions and a reference to German expressionism that I hadn't picked out before. Paul Williams is perfect as the mephistophelian Swan, purveyor of Death Records, with its beautiful dead crow logo that crops up everywhere in the design of the movie. The satire on the hit machine music industry is sharp, oh, and Gerrit Graham as the gay (or at least effeminate) heavy metal singer, Beef, is still probably my favorite character in the whole thing. "I know drug real from real real." It struck me last night that this would make a good double feature with The Rocky Horror Picture Show (1975), which has a similar glam musical and genre mash-up sensibility. Speaking of favorite movies in my college days.
Before that I watched Abel Ferrara's adaptation of William Gibson's New Rose Hotel (1998). I had heard such horrible things about this movie when it came out (direct-to-video, as I recall) that I was never interested in giving it a try, but recently on Dave Kehr's blog Brad Stevens made the case for Ferrara and specifically for New Rose Hotel as one of his masterpieces. I don't know if it's a masterpiece, but it was more interesting than I had expected from other reactions I've seen. It doesn't capture the high tech surface of Gibson's story and in fact barely feels like science fiction at all, but it does get the globalism and corporate conspiracy and Japanophilia. This is the story of a couple of conmen who are hired to convince a Japanese scientific genius to defect from the German coporation he works for. Their plan is to hire a hooker to lure him with the promise of love. So it's a very tawdry film in many ways, with more than a hint of exploitation films about it. (E.g., half-naked writhing girls.) It reminded me of Olivier Assayas' demonlover (2002) in that way, and also in the focus on corporate espionage. There were some similarities to Assayas' Boarding Gate (2007) as well, partly because Asia Argento is in both and because of the talkiness. Christopher Walken is great as Fox, the philosophical song and dance con man with the broken back, and Willem Dafoe is pretty good as the henchman who falls in love with Argento's hooker mole. One of the controversial things about the movie is that much of the story is repeated in the second half. The question is whether the repetition actually changes our understanding of what happens, or whether it just hammers the point home ham-handedly. Not sure what I think on that question myself. I will say that I think demonlover is a much, much better movie on pretty much every level. Still, I'll watch it again at some point, because the structure is something that probably requires a second viewing to fully unwind.
Still sniffling today and feeling run down. Maybe I'll watch more movies and dream of Montreal.
Urgently, ungently
Aug. 23rd, 2008 10:13 amLast night I watched Across the Universe on DVD. I bawled my eyes out in several places. It felt good. For whatever reason, I needed a good cry.
I have no idea why this movie gets to me the way it does. I mean, I love the Beatles music, so there's that. (Much as my love for Velvet Goldmine is partly my love for Eno and Roxy Music.) But the sensibility at work just really touches some raw nerves for me, some hot spots that I can't claim to understand. Why, for example, do I love Lucy's mother so much? She gets the best line in the Thanksgiving argument scene when she is able to name Kerouac's On the Road, much to Lucy's shock. "I read," Mom explains matter-of-factly. Lucy's conversations with her mom are always full of interesting clashing perspectives, and while Mom comes across as a square, her love and concern for her daughter is always palpable and feels personal. (It's one of the things that made me cry last night.) This film definitely passes the Bechdel Test.
This is the first time I've watched the DVD, and it's not as visually impressive as it was on the big screen. The waves turning into newspaper headlines in the opening credits doesn't seem to work as well as it did when it felt like the waves were going to crash on my head, and some of the color tweaking doesn't look quite right. But the flowing, unfurling development of the story is still there, getting richer and deeper the more I watch it. Not sure how it gets under my defenses, but maybe part of it too is the abiding sense of the impermanence of love. All those Beatles love songs used to express such a variety of attitudes toward and phases of love. "All My Loving" as a brush-off song, with the heard-it-before but still wistful reaction of the girl: "You bastard!" It all builds to the grand all-you-need-is-love reconciliation of Jude and Lucy, but along the way it's a magical mystery tour of every way that love goes wrong and awry.
Update: Oh yeah, forgot to mention that Evan Rachel Wood is starting to look like Ginger Rogers to me. Her face has a similar pert, insouciant look.
Update 2: I also bounced off Dreyer's Vampyr last night for the second time, and I'm setting it aside. It's like a dream, but so far it seems like kind of a boring dream.
I have no idea why this movie gets to me the way it does. I mean, I love the Beatles music, so there's that. (Much as my love for Velvet Goldmine is partly my love for Eno and Roxy Music.) But the sensibility at work just really touches some raw nerves for me, some hot spots that I can't claim to understand. Why, for example, do I love Lucy's mother so much? She gets the best line in the Thanksgiving argument scene when she is able to name Kerouac's On the Road, much to Lucy's shock. "I read," Mom explains matter-of-factly. Lucy's conversations with her mom are always full of interesting clashing perspectives, and while Mom comes across as a square, her love and concern for her daughter is always palpable and feels personal. (It's one of the things that made me cry last night.) This film definitely passes the Bechdel Test.
This is the first time I've watched the DVD, and it's not as visually impressive as it was on the big screen. The waves turning into newspaper headlines in the opening credits doesn't seem to work as well as it did when it felt like the waves were going to crash on my head, and some of the color tweaking doesn't look quite right. But the flowing, unfurling development of the story is still there, getting richer and deeper the more I watch it. Not sure how it gets under my defenses, but maybe part of it too is the abiding sense of the impermanence of love. All those Beatles love songs used to express such a variety of attitudes toward and phases of love. "All My Loving" as a brush-off song, with the heard-it-before but still wistful reaction of the girl: "You bastard!" It all builds to the grand all-you-need-is-love reconciliation of Jude and Lucy, but along the way it's a magical mystery tour of every way that love goes wrong and awry.
Update: Oh yeah, forgot to mention that Evan Rachel Wood is starting to look like Ginger Rogers to me. Her face has a similar pert, insouciant look.
Update 2: I also bounced off Dreyer's Vampyr last night for the second time, and I'm setting it aside. It's like a dream, but so far it seems like kind of a boring dream.
The Gang's All Here (1943)
Jul. 13th, 2008 08:12 amSo Edward Everett Horton, Eugene Pallette, Benny Goodman, and Carmen Miranda walk into a bar, and Busby Berkeley says, "Is that a banana on your head, or are you just happy to see me?"
I blame Yes, Dear, But Is It Surrealism?: The (Mostly) Cheerful Irrationality of Busby Berkeley’s “The Gang’s All Here.”
Come to think of it, as a piece of propaganda promoting our Good Neighbor Policy during WWII, this one's about as bizarre as North Star from the same year, which features Walter Huston, Dana Andrews, and Anne Baxter as Russian peasants singing happy Russian peasant songs, promoting our new pact with the Soviet Union. Meanwhile in Nazi Germany, Josef von Baky was creating the lush, trippy, melancholy Münchhausen in full Agfacolor to prove that Germany could out-spectacle Hollywood. What a strange year for cinema. (See also Val Lewton's bleak ode to Satanism and suicide, The Seventh Victim, and Universal's Son of Dracula, about a woman who longs to become a vampire.)
I blame Yes, Dear, But Is It Surrealism?: The (Mostly) Cheerful Irrationality of Busby Berkeley’s “The Gang’s All Here.”
Come to think of it, as a piece of propaganda promoting our Good Neighbor Policy during WWII, this one's about as bizarre as North Star from the same year, which features Walter Huston, Dana Andrews, and Anne Baxter as Russian peasants singing happy Russian peasant songs, promoting our new pact with the Soviet Union. Meanwhile in Nazi Germany, Josef von Baky was creating the lush, trippy, melancholy Münchhausen in full Agfacolor to prove that Germany could out-spectacle Hollywood. What a strange year for cinema. (See also Val Lewton's bleak ode to Satanism and suicide, The Seventh Victim, and Universal's Son of Dracula, about a woman who longs to become a vampire.)
Sweeney Todd, take two
Jan. 5th, 2008 04:21 pmSo I saw Sweeney Todd a second time at a matinee today. The opening credits really are brilliant, following the trail of blood into the cogs of the machine, telling the story in a completely symbolic form right up front. I love the look of the movie, and they did a good job telling the story and adapting the music -- which is of course gorgeous stuff, lyrical and dark, although perhaps missing too much of the dissonance of the original. I love how at the margins of the story, the city looks like a storybook, like a paper pop-up city, unreal. The ending is perfect, as I said before. Truly poetic; maybe the most poetic thing I've seen in a movie in the past year.
However. (Did you feel the "however" coming?) The two leads are a problem for me. It took me two viewings to be sure, but I don't even like Johnny Depp's performance very much. That's coming from a huge Johnny Depp fan, too. It's not just that I don't like his singing, although it's true that I don't like his singing. It's possible this is in fact the core of the problem, because so much of the story and character in the musical are conveyed in the songs. But basically Depp is not believably demonic or monstrous or malevolent. There's nothing threatening about him. He does a great job at staring into the abyss with black eyes out of a German Expressionist nightmare, but he can't sell the murderous rage boiling in Sweeney's character. At least not to me.
Another problem is that he doesn't connect well with Helena Bonham Carter's Mrs. Lovett. The byplay between them lacks energy, even in things like "A Little Priest" where Sweeney lets his defenses down and conspires with her against the world. Again, this is at least partly due to the fact that neither of them can sing well enough to put the song across, but it has seemed to me before that Depp has a hard time connecting with the female leads in his movies. Perhaps that's why he's such a great fantasy figure, because we can all fantasize that he's holding himself back for us.
Sacha Baron Cohen is terrific as Pirelli, as is Timothy Spall as Beadle Bamford, in an unctuous, vicious performance. Rickman is also really good as Judge Turpin, although also not a great singer. Actually, most aspects of the movie are really good, except for the two lead performances. But as they are the lead performances, that's a pretty big problem.
Still, as a gothic theater of blood, it is a lot of fun. That compensates for a lot. And Sondheim's music covers a lot of sins as well, even toned down as it is. Lots of geeky visual nods to other movies, too, from Murnau's Nosferatu (the ship coming into port out of the fog at the beginning) to Corman's The Pit and the Pendulum (the oven looks a lot like the iron maiden in which Barbara Steele is trapped in that one) to the completely gratuitous camera plunge through CGI alleys and byways that appears to be lifted directly from Baz Luhrman's Moulin Rouge. That latter is a serious misstep, I think, but it's brief.
However. (Did you feel the "however" coming?) The two leads are a problem for me. It took me two viewings to be sure, but I don't even like Johnny Depp's performance very much. That's coming from a huge Johnny Depp fan, too. It's not just that I don't like his singing, although it's true that I don't like his singing. It's possible this is in fact the core of the problem, because so much of the story and character in the musical are conveyed in the songs. But basically Depp is not believably demonic or monstrous or malevolent. There's nothing threatening about him. He does a great job at staring into the abyss with black eyes out of a German Expressionist nightmare, but he can't sell the murderous rage boiling in Sweeney's character. At least not to me.
Another problem is that he doesn't connect well with Helena Bonham Carter's Mrs. Lovett. The byplay between them lacks energy, even in things like "A Little Priest" where Sweeney lets his defenses down and conspires with her against the world. Again, this is at least partly due to the fact that neither of them can sing well enough to put the song across, but it has seemed to me before that Depp has a hard time connecting with the female leads in his movies. Perhaps that's why he's such a great fantasy figure, because we can all fantasize that he's holding himself back for us.
Sacha Baron Cohen is terrific as Pirelli, as is Timothy Spall as Beadle Bamford, in an unctuous, vicious performance. Rickman is also really good as Judge Turpin, although also not a great singer. Actually, most aspects of the movie are really good, except for the two lead performances. But as they are the lead performances, that's a pretty big problem.
Still, as a gothic theater of blood, it is a lot of fun. That compensates for a lot. And Sondheim's music covers a lot of sins as well, even toned down as it is. Lots of geeky visual nods to other movies, too, from Murnau's Nosferatu (the ship coming into port out of the fog at the beginning) to Corman's The Pit and the Pendulum (the oven looks a lot like the iron maiden in which Barbara Steele is trapped in that one) to the completely gratuitous camera plunge through CGI alleys and byways that appears to be lifted directly from Baz Luhrman's Moulin Rouge. That latter is a serious misstep, I think, but it's brief.
The Weakened
Jun. 19th, 2006 03:21 pmSo it was a good weekend. The Solstice Parade on Saturday was a blast, with the weird giant babies and the goddess with the fountain breasts a particular highlight, even if it did slow the parade down. Afterwards, I got a cajun salmon burger at Ballard Brothers and visited with Art Widner,
holyoutlaw and
juliebata for a while. Art confessed that he invented science fiction gaming in 1943 with a board game he called Interplanetary, in which the planets move and you have to calculate a course to land on them. In the evening, Denys and I went next door for a barbecue, and still later, round midnight, the neighbor came in through my window to drink, smoke, and listen to music. Welcome, o Summer!
On Sunday, I watched movies, starting with the Hong Kong musical Perhaps Love (2005), which ended up gutting me like a trout. It was a fitting companion to Choose Me (1984), which I watched for a second time on Friday. Choose Me is, in
akirlu's memorable phrase, an odd species of '80s noir, with an overriding mood of romantic melancholy. The title is a plea for love, and the ensemble of well-drawn eccentric characters are all looking for it in the wrong places -- every one of them (except perhaps Genevieve Bujold's delightful Dr. Love) a femme or homme fatale. It's a smoky, jazzy meditation on how love makes fools of us all, with a wonderful, soulful soundtrack by Luther Vandross, mostly sung by Teddy Pendergrass.
So that got me in the mood, and then Perhaps Love delivered the sucker punch. It's a postmodern musical about the filming of a movie. The movie within the movie is about a girl who loses her memory and is taken into the circus by a ringmaster. The boyfriend she has forgotten comes to the circus to try to get her to remember him. As they film this story, we learn that the actress playing the girl was once in love with the actor playing the boy, and that she left him to become a star under the tutelage of the director, who is now her lover. While I found the male ingenue, played by Takeshi Kaneshiro, irritatingly mopey and whiny, the story of first love, lost love, and then the attempt to rekindle it, the desperate plea to not be forgotten ... At the emotional climax of the film, I was bawling like a baby, and that ended up pissing me off, because I thought I was well over it, seven months on. But I dreamed about her last week, and she grew colder and more distant in my dream. So maybe I needed another cry to let go a little more, but it pissed me off to need it.
But instead of spinning out, I counterprogrammed by then watching the first part of Louis Feuillade's serial crime thriller Fantomas (1913) -- a movie, or at least character, that got several namechecks in Banlieue 13. Once in the dreamlike world of silent movies, I had to continue with an umpteenth viewing of the old dark house thriller, The Bat (1926), with its wonderful towering gothic sets that must have influenced Gorey as much as the titular character's bat signal influenced Bob Kane. No romantic melancholy here, and it seemed that everything was okay again. Dunno what or if I dreamed after that, but I woke up this morning refreshed. The gutted trout miraculously swims upstream ...
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
On Sunday, I watched movies, starting with the Hong Kong musical Perhaps Love (2005), which ended up gutting me like a trout. It was a fitting companion to Choose Me (1984), which I watched for a second time on Friday. Choose Me is, in
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
So that got me in the mood, and then Perhaps Love delivered the sucker punch. It's a postmodern musical about the filming of a movie. The movie within the movie is about a girl who loses her memory and is taken into the circus by a ringmaster. The boyfriend she has forgotten comes to the circus to try to get her to remember him. As they film this story, we learn that the actress playing the girl was once in love with the actor playing the boy, and that she left him to become a star under the tutelage of the director, who is now her lover. While I found the male ingenue, played by Takeshi Kaneshiro, irritatingly mopey and whiny, the story of first love, lost love, and then the attempt to rekindle it, the desperate plea to not be forgotten ... At the emotional climax of the film, I was bawling like a baby, and that ended up pissing me off, because I thought I was well over it, seven months on. But I dreamed about her last week, and she grew colder and more distant in my dream. So maybe I needed another cry to let go a little more, but it pissed me off to need it.
But instead of spinning out, I counterprogrammed by then watching the first part of Louis Feuillade's serial crime thriller Fantomas (1913) -- a movie, or at least character, that got several namechecks in Banlieue 13. Once in the dreamlike world of silent movies, I had to continue with an umpteenth viewing of the old dark house thriller, The Bat (1926), with its wonderful towering gothic sets that must have influenced Gorey as much as the titular character's bat signal influenced Bob Kane. No romantic melancholy here, and it seemed that everything was okay again. Dunno what or if I dreamed after that, but I woke up this morning refreshed. The gutted trout miraculously swims upstream ...
I don't think I can even begin to approach the level of Robert Keser's review at Bright Lights Film Journal, so I encourage everyone to read it. I only wish he'd talked a bit more about the mythical and/or literary roots of the story. Is this based on a famous story or play? All Keser says is it's "the oft-filmed tale of a tanuki — a raccoon-like creature known for its shapeshifting — who assumes the human form of a beauteous princess who loves an exiled prince."
This is an amazing film. I finally got all the way through to the end last night after being interrupted in two previous viewings (once right before the end, as it turns out) and showing the first half hour to friends twice as well. I've seen two other Seijun Suzuki movies, Tokyo Drifter and Branded to Kill, and while I liked the candy-colored surrealism of the former, I found both of these gangster films a bit too abstract and frenetic to connect to. Princess Raccoon is still fairly abstract, but somehow more generous of humanity -- even raccoon humanity. It goes even further than Moulin Rouge down the road of the postmodern musical, although it skips insouciantly through the tragic heartbreak and into a calm, even comic, view of death. But it plays similarly with the artificiality of the stage/screen and with the pop music mash up.
There are levels other than story-origin that I think I'm missing, particularly the way it plays with kabuki forms. I don't know much about kabuki. But the thing is, it plays with everything. The playfulness of the visuals, the music, the acting, the editing, the sound effects, the staging, the production design, etc., etc. is just delightful. It's all lighter than air. There is such a sense of joy that it gives me hope for my own old age. If Suzuki can make something like this at age 82, there is something right with the world.
Also, Zhang Ziyi is building a very strong case for being the biggest international star of the day. Nicole Kidman is the only other star I can think of offhand who is so determinedly working with every great director she can. Maybe Johnny Depp is another.
As a final note, IMDb only has this under its Japanese title. Pretty sparse entry, with two out of three of the user comments being idiotic.
This is an amazing film. I finally got all the way through to the end last night after being interrupted in two previous viewings (once right before the end, as it turns out) and showing the first half hour to friends twice as well. I've seen two other Seijun Suzuki movies, Tokyo Drifter and Branded to Kill, and while I liked the candy-colored surrealism of the former, I found both of these gangster films a bit too abstract and frenetic to connect to. Princess Raccoon is still fairly abstract, but somehow more generous of humanity -- even raccoon humanity. It goes even further than Moulin Rouge down the road of the postmodern musical, although it skips insouciantly through the tragic heartbreak and into a calm, even comic, view of death. But it plays similarly with the artificiality of the stage/screen and with the pop music mash up.
There are levels other than story-origin that I think I'm missing, particularly the way it plays with kabuki forms. I don't know much about kabuki. But the thing is, it plays with everything. The playfulness of the visuals, the music, the acting, the editing, the sound effects, the staging, the production design, etc., etc. is just delightful. It's all lighter than air. There is such a sense of joy that it gives me hope for my own old age. If Suzuki can make something like this at age 82, there is something right with the world.
Also, Zhang Ziyi is building a very strong case for being the biggest international star of the day. Nicole Kidman is the only other star I can think of offhand who is so determinedly working with every great director she can. Maybe Johnny Depp is another.
As a final note, IMDb only has this under its Japanese title. Pretty sparse entry, with two out of three of the user comments being idiotic.