randy_byers: (2009-05-10)
The year is drawing to a close, and I am succumbing to the urge to look back. The calendar year is an arbitrary unit for contemplation, but it's also a handy way to parse things into intelligible chunks. As such, 2014 doesn't seems very remarkable in any way, but maybe I'm just in a jaded mood.

In many ways the highlight of the year was the trip I took to Europe in August. It's hard to overstate what an acre lot of fun that was. The first part of the trip, in which my sister and I treated Mom to a visit to Amsterdam and ancestral lands in eastern France was definitely one none of us will ever forget. My sister's French friend, Kelly, opened up doors to our past that we probably wouldn't even have noticed if we'd been on our own. Then for me it was onward to London for beer tourism and the mighty Worldcon, which was almost fannish overload. Well, no, it was definitely fannish overload. There's a part of me that doesn't enjoy overseas travel as much as I once did, but it's hard to remember why while I'm in the middle of it having so much damned fun.

Other than that I traveled to San Jose for Potlatch in February and had a splendid time there with exotic foreign visitors (the Fishlifters) and various other well-memorized faces. This was followed by another of my retreats to Astoria and the Olympic Peninsula, which have rapidly become one of my very favorite things in the whole wide world ever. The other relatively long trip was the drive to Southern California with my parents in November, and I once again really enjoyed the scenic drive along the Sierra Nevadas on Highway 395. Other than that there were several trips to Oregon to visit the family, including the big pig roast family birthday party at my brother's place in July and another family birthday party at Waldport on the coast. Now that my parents' Oregon abode is back in Portland, I've really been enjoying taking the train from Seattle. It's a lot more relaxing than driving or flying.

A lot less satisfying in some ways was my year in writing and publishing. We only got out one issue of Chunga, and that was way back in January. We had been getting out two issues a year recently, so this felt like a step backward. I also felt like I didn't do much writing for other fanzines. I had pieces published in John Purcell's Askance and Pete Young's Big Sky (thanks, guys!), but the more major piece I wrote about 30 years living in Seattle was rejected by the fanzine that solicited it. Even worse, I had to agree that it wasn't a very good piece and thus not worth submitting elsewhere, and this failure has had me contemplating my navel a bit. Have I gotten stagnant? Do I have anything left to say? Why do I want to write? Sometimes I think I just write from reflex now, but then again, maybe that's the best reason to write. I just don't want to get rote, right?

The bulk of my writing was on the internet. I still feel very ambivalent about my (mostly) film blog, Dreamland Cafe, but it does give me a reason to write, even if I'm not sure of the reason why I write. Do I really have anything to say about film? Wouldn't I be better off to just write about science fiction, where I have twice as many decades of experience and knowledge to back up my analysis? Perhaps the most striking thing to me about the blog is that the two most popular articles in the past year have been one I wrote in 2013 about slavery stories, which keeps getting found by people using search terms like "plantation sex stories," and the piece I wrote in February about the French film The Ring Finger. Considering the fetishistic sexual interest that seems to be driving the readers of the slavery post, it's hard not to assume that people are searching for the piece about The Ring Finger looking for nude screencaps of Olga Kurylenko or to contemplate the sadomasochistic bent of the film. Nonetheless, that's probably the best thing I wrote for the Dreamland Cafe last year.

Meanwhile, my LiveJournal plugs along as a repository for trip reports, convention reports, book reports, and memorials to dead friends. I think I'm still writing some good things here, although since I outed my true identity it feels as though I'm writing less personal stuff. Not sure if that's actually true. Is this post personal?

The biggest surprise development this year came on the job front. After years of stasis partly caused by reduced budgets in the aftermath of the Great Recession, we were finally given the funds to hire two new reporting positions. Since I'm a "super SME" for student data, it will be my responsibility to train these two new people in the mysteries of student data, which means a lot more work is being put on my plate. What is perhaps most surprising is that one of the key figures behind the allocation of funds for these positions also pushed heavily to give me a significant raise commensurate with my new responsibilities (and my old ones too). That's all still being negotiated, but the tea leaf readings are positive. What I take away from this is that after 25 years of working here, I have developed some powerful allies. I still worry about what's going to happen when one of my biggest long-term allies and mentors retires next year, but it's encouraging to know that I'll still have people who might be able to help me if I need it.

Finally, there's my health. Three years after getting a wake up call about growing insulin resistance, which caused me to make fairly significant dietary and life style changes, I developed a nagging pain in my right shoulder that was diagnosed as rotator cuff tendinitis. This put me on a course of stretches and exercises that have increased my upper body strength. Between the recent weight loss, eating better, getting more cardio, and now putting on some muscle in my shoulders, I'm feeling unexpectedly fit. At the same time, at age 54 my body is definitely showing its age, and while I may have built up my shoulder muscles, I'm losing muscle mass elsewhere. Part of me wonders whether the tendinitis, which is caused by impingement, was the result of losing muscle mass that had previously been keeping the impinging bones at bay. In any event, I'm feeling pretty damned good physically right now, but the slow slide is in progress.

Well, no doubt I could natter on some more about various projects and plans and desires, but I won't. I've been feeling slightly blue today, but I think it's just a random existential mood. I remember when I broke up with Sharee back in 2005 I felt that I'd probably reached the pinnacle of what I was going to accomplish in life and it would be all downhill from there. Two years later I'd somehow finagled my way onto some Hugo-winning coattails. The thing I ask myself more and more these days is how can I help younger people face their challenges in the way that I was helped as a young man. My goal for a long time has been not to be a burden on anyone else, even if I'm not strong enough to carry anyone else's burden. But can I do more? Can I help to lift other people up? I really don't know, but it's been on my mind.

And on that note I wish you bottoms up for the new year.
randy_byers: (2010-08-15)
I've finally completed the first draft of an epic trip report about my travels in November 2010. It's sitting at 20,000 words right now. I've sent it off to five people for feedback. This has been a long process, but I'm happy to have reached this stage. Makes it seem more likely that I'll actually finish the damn thing.
randy_byers: (2010-08-15)
Sorry if that last post was a bit raw. Feeling clearly is hard work, and I didn't put in the work on that one.

So let me try to take this deeper. This is actually something I was thinking of writing a year or two ago but decided was just too much navel-gazing. Maybe it can be therapy instead. Or therapeutic navel-gazing, or something.

Cutting to the quick )
randy_byers: (2010-08-15)
So as I was writing about Joanna Russ over the weekend, I thought it might be cute to find the paragraph of hers I'd mimicked and post it along with my version. So last night I pulled out the ancient folder containing the story I did this for, "Singularities". It smelled of mildew, although the paper all looked clean. Notebook paper with handwritten text, typewriter paper with typed text. There was the Seal of approval that carl had drawn for me when I was feeling down about the quality of what I'd written. And here were two different versions of the paragraph I had based on Russ. Loooooooong paragraph. Starts off well, but uh-oh, quickly becomes pointlessly weird and stilted. So I looked at the second version, which takes it more in the direction of the story I wanted to tell. Well, there's more story there, the weirdness is more pointed, but boy is it stilted and disconnected and inhuman. I read the first paragraph of the finished story, and it was so horribly over-intellectualized that I immediately stopped. This was bringing up bad memories.

So I pulled out the slightly-less-ancient folder that contained the novella, "Recognition", which was the longer version of the same story that I wrote after I moved to Seattle. Started reading the first paragraph, which was completely different from the original opening -- and boy was it horribly precious and confusing and over-written. I looked briefly at the notes that Victor wrote after he read it, and his first point was that the shifting verb tenses was a bad idea. No shit! What the hell was I thinking?

I put the folder away, and I spun out. I got really upset. I had to leave the house. And I was surprised by how upset I felt. I thought I'd put my dream of being a great writer behind me. I thought I had found a niche of amateur journalism that made a lot more sense for my personality. And I think I have. What I didn't realize is that moving on didn't mean those old feelings of failure, disappointment, and self-loathing from the era of trying to write fiction had been resolved. Wow. I can't say I missed those feelings! What a cesspit.

So I went down to the Pacific Inn and ordered a two-piece fish and chips. I drank a couple of pints of fine local beer. I watched NBA basketball for an hour and exchanged quips with the bartender, Bobby. And I went back home, and I read a few pieces from Dave Kehr's collection of movie reviews, and everything was fine. Ugly feelings back in the folder, back in the file cabinet.

I know this is kind of a cheat. There's more I could say about why I failed as fiction writer, and particularly about how over-intellectualized I was as a young man and how much work I put into learning how to feel (one of the insights I gained from reading Russ was how much work it is to feel clearly), and how much help I got from my friends (and from a counselor) doing so, how much I still fail on that front (c.f. romantic relationships). How much the learning process led my writing in a different, less ambitious, direction that is a much better fit for who I am. And there, that's my outline of a deeper self-portrait. I feel rattled even saying that much. Funny where a little fond nostalgia for the old days will lead you.
randy_byers: (2010-08-15)
I mowed half the lawn yesterday, and it was the back half at that, so the neighbors still have to look at a jungle out front. I'd already spent an hour pruning the raspberries and rebuilding the raspberry frame, so just half a yard of mowing heavy, wet grass was enough for me. It feels as though this was pretty late for raspberry pruning, and I'm not sure if that's because I've been so busy doing other things or because it really has been unseasonably chilly this year. I just have not felt like getting out into the yard this year, whatever the reason. On the other hand, this is not at all late for the first mowing of the year. I think it almost always happens in April, because it's too wet before then.

I also got a lot of writing done this weekend, both on my blog, on LiveJournal, and on the trip report, which I finally got back to after two weekends off. It has been very interesting working on a longer-form piece (circa 15,000 words at this point), which is not something I've done much of. I've been making notes in the manuscript of places where I want to expand or add more detail, and indeed yesterday was spent expanding on what I'd written the day before. It feels like I'm composing both forward and backward -- that as I move forward I'm changing my idea of what I've already written. There's lots of anxiety around the process, but there's also a lot of feeling of discovery, which is the fun part of writing. I've also got a lot of thoughts about the blog-so-far, but I think I'm going to resist analyzing for a bit longer. Perhaps needless to say, my thoughts about why I'm doing it are changing.

I went to Vanguard Saturday night. I hadn't been planning on it, but Craig Smith asked if I could give him a ride, so I thought what the hell. Turned out to be a relatively big Vanguard, perhaps because it was also Andy & Carrie's 25th wedding anniversary party and Julie & Luke's 5th wedding anniversary party. It was fun, even with the traditional ritual where Victor tries to talk me into buying an Apple product. Even Jane showed up, which was good to see. I drank a series of beers from Russian River Brewing tracing my spiritual path: Redemption, Damnation, Salvation. Out of order, but that's the story of my life.
randy_byers: (2010-08-15)
It isn't all drunken debauchery around here, you know. For the past couple of months I've been working on a travelogue/trip report about my travels in November 2010. I've written close to 13,000 words at this point, and I'm just to the point of leaving Britain. This is already the longest thing I've written since Travels with the Wild Child, which was just over 30,000 words. Of course there's no certainty yet that I'll finish this or that I'll publish it if I do. We'll see how it turns out, if it turns out.

I'm also continuing to work on setting up a blog to use as a repository for my film and early science fiction reviews. I've been reading a WordPress book that [livejournal.com profile] holyoutlaw let me borrow, and this weekend I've been trying to settle on a theme (as the visual scheme is called in WordPress). Any comments or suggestions would be welcome. There are some other WordPress features that I want to understand before I start posting. Still, it feels like I'm getting closer.

And now that I've bragged about how productive I've been, I think I'll goof off for the rest of the day. Work has been kind of stressful lately, since I've been delving into a piece of software that I don't understand very well, but last week I made headway on that front too. Progress!
randy_byers: (cesare)
Yesterday I went back through my 2010 posts on film -- and I didn't make it all the way, because I wrote a lot about film in 2010. I liked a fair number of my more ambitious posts, and it got me thinking -- again -- about trying to make my film writing more accessible. I block search engines on my LiveJournal just to make it slightly harder for the uninitiated to find the personal writing here. Mostly I'm not eager for my family to find this. I prefer to interact with them on Facebook.

So how do I make my film writing discoverable by search engines but not my other LJ writing? I could start a separate LJ dedicated to film writing (and maybe other non-personal writing too). I could Friends-lock all my personal writing on this journal and unblock the journal as a whole from search engines. One problem I have with the latter solution is the amount of work it would take to go through my whole journal Friends-locking personal posts. The problem I have with the former solution is the amount of work it would take to transfer my past film writing to a new location. On the other hand, I could just start a film journal from scratch and forget all my fucking-brilliant past work. But then I also worry that if I started writing about film for an anonymous (i.e., open) audience, I would start over-thinking it. As I am probably over-thinking this whole issue right here, right now.

And so once more inertia wraps me in its ample arms.

I suppose another option would be to Friends-lock all my past posts in this journal (there's a way to do it globally, isn't there?), unblock the search engines, and then write unlocked posts going forward that I don't mind being searchable. I could unlock past posts on film as I had the time and interest in doing so. Hm.
randy_byers: (2009-05-10)
Seeing the "I Write Like" meme on a few of my Friends' pages, I started thinking about who has actually influenced me as a writer. It's not an easy question to answer, and my knee-jerk response to the meme is "I Write Like Myself". However, when I was taking creative writing courses in college my professor (Don Taylor) said my style (such as it was at the time) reminded him of J.D. Salinger, which was probably a reflection of the fact that I was reading Salinger at the time. He also recommended I read Heinrich Böll, because he thought he could see some resemblances there too. Not sure it's a good thing when your writing sounds as though it has been translated into English from German, especially when you don't speak German. At the time I would have preferred to write like Faulkner, but apparently it didn't come out that way.

Around that same era I was an avid reader of the SF and criticism of Samuel R. Delany, Joanna Russ, and Thomas Disch, with John Crowley discovered a couple of years later and quickly rising to the same level in my estimation. In another writing class -- a one-on-one class with Linda Robertson -- she had me take a paragraph from a Joan Didion essay and replace each noun with a different noun, each verb with a different verb, each adjective with etc, using the resulting paragraph in a piece of my own on a different topic. That was so much fun that I promptly did the same with a Joanna Russ paragraph (from And Chaos Died) for a story I wrote for another Don Taylor class. Russ may well be the one writer I most wish I could write like. I love her precision, efficiency, terse lyricism, and mercurial shifts in tone. I love her sense of humor.

For my fannish writing I've often hearkened back to the two issues of Convention Girl's Digest, written by Sharee, Lucy Huntzinger, and Allyn Cadogan in the mid-'80s. Again, I loved the humor, the dreaminess, the chatty-friendly tone. carl and Denys were both big influences on my fannish writing style as well -- and thus on the writing in this LJ.

So if this meme could come back with "I Write Like a Poor Translation of Heinrich Böll" or "I Write Like Lucy Huntzinger" or "I Stole This Paragraph from Joan Didion", it might actually be saying something interesting.
randy_byers: (2009-05-10)
It strikes me that perhaps what I want from a girlfriend is less a lover or a companion or a partner than a muse. I want someone who inspires me to write the best that I can. That's something that Sharee was very good for, even after we stopped being a couple, but I need a new muse. Which amongst other things means I need new passwords.

This is part of a recent reflection that I'm still digesting my experience with Sharee last year and will probably never really understand it, but at least I got a good fanzine article out of it.

Cf. also Hazel, who was only ever a muse, never a girlfriend -- but ten years a muse.

Muses are less messy than lovers, and Ramdu abhors a mess, unlike Nature.
randy_byers: (2009-05-10)
Various blogging friends are wishing Ursula Le Guin happy birthday on the occasion of her 80th. I think the blog posts are being compiled, but I don't think this typically self-centered post is appropriate for that project. Still, I can't help but throw in my two cents.

The only personal interaction I've had with Le Guin was when I workshopped a story in a Taste of Clarion workshop at an early Potlatch. She was one of the two professional writers in my group, and Le Guin gave me the best, toughest comments on a story that I ever got from anyone, going back to my earliest efforts in high school and college. She basically called me out for projecting a superior knowingness toward the reader in what was actually a terminally confused narrative that was only pretending to be complex, while she also recognized what was good in it: the precise use of language, the story of a soul journey. She invited me to rewrite it and send it to her again.

Well, I was unable to rewrite the story, as I had been unable to rewrite/improve any of my attempts at fiction over the years. However, this failure was the point at which I really began to question my ability to write fiction, and it wasn't long until I finally decided I didn't have what it takes. This was also around the time that I started writing for fanzines, which was another factor in the decision. I put a huge effort into writing and self-publishing, fanzine-style, a memoir/road trip piece that I called "Travels with the Wild Child," which I considered a very big deal in my development as a writer. I sent it to several professional writers with whom I felt I had some kind of connection, including Le Guin. In my cover letter I explained that she had offered to look at the rewrite of my workshop story, but I was sending her this instead.

Bless her heart, she actually responded (unlike the other writers I sent the piece to, not that I blame them), patiently explaining that she didn't have time to read such a thing, let alone to critique it, her offer had been specific, and it wasn't cool for me to try to change the game. It felt like a bit of chin music, a bit of a brush back, a challenge. I felt really stupid. On the advice of a writer friend who knows Le Guin, I sent her a brief note apologizing for my faux pas and thanking her for taking the time to explain the ground rules to a rube.

From this vantage, I really appreciate both of those interactions, because I feel that she was exercising her power as an established writer for good. She was both trying to encourage me and also warning me to get serious and stop with the games. There's a joke that the problem with MFA writing programs is that they don't do enough to discourage people from writing. Le Guin wasn't discouraging me from writing, but she was discouraging me from just pretending to be a writer. I respect her for that. It was a good thing for me to stop bashing my head against the wall of fiction and train my talents in more fruitful directions.

A few years ago, at another Potlatch, Vonda McIntyre arranged to surprise Le Guin with a presentation of her SFWA Grand Master award, which she hadn't been able to accept at the official awards ceremony. Vonda let all of us know that she was going to spring the award on Le Guin at the trivia quiz, and she arranged for something like a dozen people to walk into the room with Le Guin masks at the moment of the presentation. So halfway through the trivia quiz, with Le Guin doing some knitting at the back of the room and calling out occasional answers or comments, Vonda made the signal, and the people with the Le Guin masks filed into the room. All the rest of us stood up and cheered like crazy people. Le Guin was utterly stunned, and when Vonda brought her the Grand Master award, she burst into tears. It was one of the most moving moments I've ever experienced at a convention. It's the type of thing that makes science fiction fandom so great, as we thanked one of our own for a lifetime of achievement in the field.

So happy birthday to Ursula K Le Guin -- a true grand master. And thanks for the whack upside the head. It did me good.
randy_byers: (2009-05-10)
So I'm in the final stages of writing my Worldcon report. This is always the most difficult part of the process for me, because at this point it looks like a barrel of unappetizing sludge to my eyes. The sentences are awkward, the paragraphs are incoherent, and the arguments and observations are, frankly, stupid and reveal me for a self-centered, self-deluded, and altogether clapped-out fraud. Now, I've been through this process enough times to know that at least part of it is just psychological flak and failure of self-confidence, but of course that doesn't help me to see what changes might actually improve the damned thing. Fortunately this is intended for publication in a fanzine, and the editors of said fanzine will give me feedback so that I'm not just stuck with the confused messages from my nasty-ass backbrain.

But I really hate this part of the writing process, and I'm struck by how different it is to write for my LiveJournal. I almost never suffer this level of self-doubt when I write here, because I'm not writing for publication. It's just a fricking LiveJournal, so who cares how incoherent it is? Roll your eyes and move on to the next post, right? Which isn't to say that I don't fuss over my writing here. I frequently revise my LJ posts, even after it's not likely that anyone else will ever look at them again. But I never get to the stage of thinking, "This is just crap, and I have no idea how to fix it. I stink."

Is this why some people give up writing for publication and just blog instead?

Profile

randy_byers: (Default)
randy_byers

September 2017

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10 111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 27th, 2025 11:28 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios